Post by messi05 on Jan 24, 2024 8:18:32 GMT 1
TFR-1, would not authorize imposing responsibility for high-cost services on a municipality of 10 thousand inhabitants. In view of all the variables observed there, the municipality of Capim Branco has the duty to guarantee basic care services and respond by referring its residents to services appropriate to their needs in the health care network. If you are unable to do so for reasons other than your own, the state or federal manager is responsible for reimbursing the municipality for the resources spent. The path to recovering the resources should, firstly, be administrative, within the scope of the intermanagement committee, and then legal.
What the municipality in question cannot do is Buy Phone Number List shoulder a responsibility that is not its own, as it is not its responsibility, within the regional interfederative network, to guarantee services beyond basic care. It is not in keeping with the SUS to determine expenses that are not their own for the entity with less economic and financial power, making it necessary to review joint liability as it is a solitary responsibility that goes against the organizational-constitutional model of the SUS, which is systemic and integrated.
Civil Appeal Under Complementary Law 141 and Constitutional Amendment 86, municipalities are responsible for investing 15% of their revenues in health; to the states, 12%; and to the Union, the value of 15% of its current net revenues. [3] In health, the transfer of resources from the Union to states and municipalities does not follow the logic of apportioning participation funds that adopts demographic criteria alone; In health, the National Health Fund resources to be apportioned must comply with the criteria of Complementary Law 141, which are based on federative asymmetries that must be observed when defining responsibilities for health services.
What the municipality in question cannot do is Buy Phone Number List shoulder a responsibility that is not its own, as it is not its responsibility, within the regional interfederative network, to guarantee services beyond basic care. It is not in keeping with the SUS to determine expenses that are not their own for the entity with less economic and financial power, making it necessary to review joint liability as it is a solitary responsibility that goes against the organizational-constitutional model of the SUS, which is systemic and integrated.
Civil Appeal Under Complementary Law 141 and Constitutional Amendment 86, municipalities are responsible for investing 15% of their revenues in health; to the states, 12%; and to the Union, the value of 15% of its current net revenues. [3] In health, the transfer of resources from the Union to states and municipalities does not follow the logic of apportioning participation funds that adopts demographic criteria alone; In health, the National Health Fund resources to be apportioned must comply with the criteria of Complementary Law 141, which are based on federative asymmetries that must be observed when defining responsibilities for health services.